A woman ran a red light and hit a man in a van.
She failed at her attempt to be at the same place as the man at the same time as the man.
An impossible situation.
A collision.
The woman.
The man.
A witness to the collision told the police officer what happened.
"I was behind her. I saw her run the red light and hit the man's van."
The law of the land and the law of creation had spoken to the woman, the cause of the collision.
From the law of the land, the judgment was this:
She ran the red light, she hit the man's van, and she must pay for her damages and his.
From the law of creation, the judgment was this:
Two physical objects (in this case, vehicles) cannot coexist in time and space.
To attempt contradictory coexistence brings damage to one or both objects (or vehicles.)
***
The situation with the collision ends.
The woman paid the man in the van.
Justice came to the man.
Now comes a new situation, one directly connected to the collision.
***
On the day of the collision, the woman's destination was to an operation where the woman would become a man. Her destination was a collision of the masculine and the feminine, an attempt at an impossible situation--the collision of creation and Creator.
What will happen if she continues with this destination?
No comments:
Post a Comment